# Tuesday, October 02, 2007

Paula's using my old laptop and Pa really needs to take it out back behind the barn with a shotgun.  It's slow, it won't dock properly and I really don't like the way it's been looking at the toaster.

This past weekend we finally bit the bullet and placed an order for a new laptop for Paula, the ThinkPad X61s.  Paula's top desire is small and light and this unit fit the bill (as well as came with a ton of awards to ease our minds).  Sony and Toshiba have some very sexy laptops... but the price of the ThinkPad sold us (although we were both tempted by the pretty hardware).  The total with shipping and tax: $1,989.93, a full $1000 less than the Sony.

We were very pleased with the results.  Paula really wanted the Sony TZ, but once we added a dock, shipping and tax the price jumped up to $3,158.07.  Lenovo had a sale on ThinkPads through October 1st making the price hard to beat.  But it gets better...

Our order was delayed because I didn't have my alternate shipping address (Leslie's house) on record with my credit card.  As part of the process I went back to the web site and what should I find?  Lenovo started a new sale.  Bad news normally, but good news for me since my order was still pending.  I canceled the order and put in a new one.  Ding!  Saved $100! 

But wait, there's more.  While I was admiring my new, lower total I noticed a blank line: "eCoupon".  I'm already getting a great price on this laptop (in my opinion)... they're not going to allow me to apply a coupon to their sale price, are they?  Only one way to find out... I type "lenovo ecoupon" into Live search and first result is for a coupon listing on Dealigg.com.  I hop back over to my order and sure enough, my good deal just got better!

End result: the laptop I was pleased to get for $1,989.93 is being shipped to me for $1,527.22. 

 

Oh, by the way, out of curiosity I went back and tried the same search on Google... the money saving coupon was seven links down.  Thanks Live Search! 

Tuesday, October 02, 2007 6:15:47 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
# Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Intel recently commissioned Ziba Design to build a sexy laptop and I'd say they hit the target... and blew right through.

About as thin as a Motorola Razr, this magnesium shelled bit of geek pron is only 2.25 pounds, has back-lit keys and an optional leather folio cover sporting an external side show screen.

For more details you'll have to check out Business Week's write-up... at least until I find out the limb to fantasy hardware exchange rate.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007 4:19:59 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Friday, February 23, 2007

Okay... what have I learned today?

cutting drive wires

  1. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
  2. Ignoring rule number 1 should only be proceeded by backing up your crap.
  3. For those who are too lazy or too confident to pay attention to either of the first two rules, this advice: don't dick around with it... dummy.
  4. Don't be a cheap bastard and use RAID striping instead of buying a full sized disk (unless you're dealing with data that is totally expendable).
  5. It takes a really long time to rip 870+ CDs... you don't want to imagine having to do it twice. 
  6. The perceived time it takes for Windows to start up increases in  logarithmic proportion to the amount of data you think you have just lost.
  7. System restore can save your butt.
  8. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. (that deserves mentioning twice)

Okay, what ruined my day you ask?  This morning, before going into work, I did a quickie web search to see if there were Vista-compatible drivers for my RAID card.  This weekend I plan on installing Vista on my home machine and I realized I needed to lay some groundwork first... like making sure there were drivers for the various bits of hardware I have.  So, there are Vista drivers, Yay! 

So, genius boy here decides to download and install the new driver at 7:30 in the morning before going to work.  Heck, it's for the card I have, no need to worry about something going wrong (sure, it seemed perfectly reasonable at the time).  A quick install and reboot later and my 500 gig music drive is suddenly two 250 gig, unreadable drives.  I almost cried.

Knowing I had to go to work and didn't have time to futz with the damn thing I just shut down, kicked myself, packed up to go to work, then kicked myself again.

The worst part of it all was that as soon as I wasn't focused on a task at work my mind would wander and ...

"CRAP!!!! I SO SCREWED MYSELF!!!!"

If I had only bought two 500 gig drives instead four 250 gig drives the failure would have been no big deal... I'd have had two identical copies of my data (see rule number four above).  Given my RAID array wasn't fully bullet-proof (and running just fine, thank you very much) I really shouldn't have even played with it in the first place (see rule's number one and three).  And so on...

All day I kept re-living my idiocy.  As soon as I could reasonably leave work I came straight home (panicking again every time my mind would wander at a stop light), dropped my coat just inside the front door and ran straight upstairs to sit down in front of my computer... the machine which I had so unceremoniously raped this morning.

I tried a couple of things, each requiring what seemed a stupendously long reboot time.  It's amazing how painful it is to watch what usually seems a reasonably quick boot time when you're imagining your entire CD collection going through a digital paper shredder.

In the end I did what I should have done first thing this morning, I used system restore to put my machine back in the state it was before I installed the drivers this morning.  Well, actually, what I should have done first thing this morning was poke myself in the eye with a pencil, and then kick myself for even considering updating the drivers for my RAID card when there was nothing wrong with it's operation to begin with, followed by poking myself in the other eye to ensure I was unable to see well enough to screw myself. 

Honestly, sometimes I have the common sense of a small soap dish.

Friday, February 23, 2007 11:43:53 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 
# Thursday, August 03, 2006

Larry Larsen has posted some very cool videos of him playing around at home with eye tracking hardware. He has some videos of him playing xbox games with eye position overlayed but I found the roller coaster video the most interesting by far (it vividly demonstrates how strongly we are drawn to look at people's eyes).

Roller coaster

Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:39:03 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, April 05, 2006

It has been a long time since the PC world migrated away from churning out beige boxes, but major manufacturers have been slow to adopt industrial design standards which can keep up with clean, well-thought-out hardware produced by Apple.  There have been periodic flashes of inspiration from Sony and Shuttle, the results, however, have been inconsistent.

With the advent of the Intel-based Mac, speculation of Windows running on an Apple Macintosh has, of course, abounded.  With Apple's latest announcement of "Boot Camp", an app which allow an Intel-based Mac to dual boot to Windows and Mac OS, we're sure to see increased adoption of the Mac platform.  Users who are willing to pay the premium price of a Mac will no longer have to worry about the issues of incompatibility with the business world.

 
Seriously, which computer do you thing a grownup is going to buy? (Sorry Michael Dell)

Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:58:00 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Ok, I admit it, smart women make my nerd beanie spin.  Brains wins over cheesecake, no doubt about it.  If, however, someone tells you smarts and style are incompatible you can give them your best Urkle laugh and walk away.

Here's a cool thing, laptop bags just for women.

While I may have ridiculed the idea someone would want to put their cell phone in a briefcase pocket which blocks out incoming RF (and, presumably, incoming calls) I do have to commend Mobile Edge for spotting a need: laptop bags which don't look like laptop bags. 

To be sure my super-powered geek-vision wasn't clouding the issue, I checked with my better 50% (who is a history geek, band geek and photogenic fashion plate).  The verdict?  Paula agrees, these are great looking bags.

Check out Mobile Edge's line of women's bags.  If I were a woman (or cross-dresser) I'd totally go right out and buy one of these.

Madison laptop bag

Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:24:15 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, October 05, 2005

Pick a trip you took from, say, two years ago.  Take a look at the pictures.  Do you remember where each picture was taken?  Exactly where?  Great, do you think you'll remember that 10 years from now?  Don't worry, there's a soution (provided you don't loose all your digital pictures in both hard drive failures you're statistically likely to have between now and then).

smugMap_sm.jpg
My picture location on a satellite map?  How cool is that?

One of the nifty bits of data that can be embedded in a pcture's EXIF data is the longitude and latitude of where the picture was taken.  Adding this data to your pictures is called "geotagging" or "geocoding". While it's not hard to manually add this data to your pictures, you can also automatically add it if you have a GPS or an expensive camera.

EXIF: Exchangeable Image Format - descriptive data embedded in an image. This data is typically inserted into a JPEG image by a digital camera and contains information about the type of camera which took the picture, the shutter speed and date the picture was taken. A variety of free and commercial tools are available to allow you to view and edit EXIF data.

Okay, that sounds cool and all that... but so what?  Why can’t you just write down the information?  Imagine a slide show that walks along the path of your vacation, showing the pictures overlaid on a satellite picture of the area.   When we went hiking in Switzerland I took a GPS along and here’s an example of what Geotagging can get you: http://maps.smugmug.com/?feedType=geoAlbum&Data=859458 (look for a link to "play" in the right-hand column).  It is a large gallery (around 370 pictures) so it takes time to both load and play, be patient.  Tip: you can zoom in and out while the slideshow plays.

Manually adding a location stamp

When you add location stamps automatically (which I’ll discuss later) you’ll likely still need to adjust some of them manually, so let’s start with the process of manually adding or adjusting the geotag of a picture.  First, got get some software (don’t worry, it’s free and easy to use).  Microsoft Research, as part of their cool World Wide Media Exchange project, created a set of free tools for adding and reading tags.
First thing you need: Location StamperLocation Stamper requires you have the Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 installed, so I suppose that is really the first thing you need… but I digress.  Go to the WWMX download page and follow the instructions to install the .NET Framework (step 1) and WWMX Location Stamper (from step 3).  Don’t worry about any of the other software on that page at this time.
Now, let’s stamp a picture.  Launch WWMX Location Stamper and select a picture from your collection by choosing "Add Photos..." from the "Photos" menu.  You can select one or more pictures at a time, but let’s start with just one.  The picture will show in the right-hand column of the Location Stamper interface.  At the bottom of the interface is a box to perform a "Location Search"; type in the address where the picture was taken.  Since Location Stamper will search the whole world, try to be as specific as possible, separating the information with commas (for example: Street, City, State, zip or City, country).  To get the location more exact, use the plus/minus icons to zoom in and out and use the white arrows at the edge of the map to pan the map.

To add the geotag, simply drag the picture from the photo area onto the correct location in the map and drop.  A small dot will appear on the map showing you the location stamped into the picture.

locationStamper_sm.gif 
Location stamper, with images ready to be stamped.

Automatically adding stamps

I mentioned before that you could buy a camera with a built-in GPS, but I don’t recommend them unless you have a distinct business need (e.g. you’re an insurance adjuster).  The cameras with built-in GPS are expensive and likely to become out of date very quickly.  The best route to go is to buy a GPS with a computer interface.  If you have a GPS it will work with any camera you have.  In our case we take two cameras on every trip, a large digital SLR for nice artistic shots and a little, pocket camera for convenience.  Having an external GPS allows us to stamp pictures from both cameras.

Step one: get a compatible GPS.  There are likely a number of GPS units which will work, but I can tell you for sure that the Garmin Geko 201, 301 and Foretrex 201 all work for this purpose.  The keys are: a) a GPS that can connect to your computer and b) a GPS that allows track data to be downloaded in GPX format.  If you’re going out on your own to pick a GSP unit, look for a unit that advertises the things above as well as good battery life and quick satellite acquisition (my two-year old Geko 301 eats batteries and can take forever to get a fix on its location).  The Garmin Geko 201 will run you about $120 new, the Forerunner 201 about $115.  You’ll also need a cable to connect your GPS to your computer (it’s not a standard item with most GPS units).

Step two: turn on your GPS and allow it to get its bearings.  If you’re sitting inside, next to your computer, you may have trouble getting a good signal.  Stop reading this and go outside. ;)

Step three: set your camera’s clock to be as close to the time displayed on the GPS as possible.  This is important because the location of the picture will be based on correlating the picture time to the GPS time.  Another thing to keep in mind: if you travel out of your home time zone you will need to perform some added time zone magic to get the pictures to line up correctly with the GPS data (I’ll discuss that later).

Step four: take some pictures.  With the Garmin GPS units (and with many other types as well, I suspect) you don’t really need to do anything other than turn them on.  The GPS will automatically start keeping a "breadcrumb" trail of your path over time.  This trail will stay in memory even if you turn off the GPS and take out the batteries.  You don’t need to save a track log unless you are running out of memory (in fact, it’s best if you can avoid saving track logs as the breadcrumb trail tends to be more detailed).

After you get your new (or break out your old) GPS and spend some time running around and taking pictures you’ll need to get the GPS data off the receiver and onto your computer.  The easiest way to do this with the Garmin units is to use the free GPS Track Download software from Microsoft Research (there are commercial applications, but once again, I’m cheap).  Follow the instructions on the WWMX download page to install the GPS Track Download software.

The Track Download interface is very minimal.  From the window select the type of data you want to download (I download track log and routes each time).  Next choose "download from device" from the action menu and select a location on your hard disk to save the GPX data.  You’re done with your GPS and Track Download for this session.

trackDownload_sm.gif 
Ready to download tracks from your GPS device.

If you haven’t already, download all your new pictures from your first location-tracked photo shoot (put them in a new folder for simplicity).  Launch Location Stamper and add all the new pictures (do this by browsing to the new folder, clicking a single picture, typing ctrl-a on the keyboard to select all and then hit the "Open" button).  Next, add tracks to Location Stamper by selecting "add tracks" from the "Tracks" menu.  You’ll see lines appear on the map pane as the GPX data is read in.  Finally, click the "Apply tracks..." button at the bottom of the picture pane.

About the apply tracks options: I find the best options to use are the options to set the location but put in a tricky cases bin, always prefer existing location information and save a backup copy.
Those are the basics.  Now that you have locations coded into your pictures here are a couple of cool things to do:

  • Upload your pictures to Smugmug, you'll get a "Map this" button automatically for any gallery with geotagged pictures (Flickr also supports Geotags).
  • If you have a web site you can use the WWMX Travelogue Builder program to make a cool travel diary with maps attached.
  • Add your pictures to the WWMX web application (the client app appears to have been hidden for some reason, but if you dig into the source of the WWMX download page you'll find it).

Some final notes

There are a couple places where things will get out of sorts when geotagging pictures:

  • Starting picture taking before starting the GPS – The location stamper software will attempt to place the pictures along the route based on time and location stamps.  On one of my trips the software placed some of my pictures in the middle of the ocean because the only GPS data it had was my home in California and a location after the picture was taken... the software just guessed the picture was somewhere in between.
  • Taking pictures in multiple time zones – EXIF data doesn’t contain a time zone stamp, but the GPS data does.  The Location Stamper will assume the time zone of the computer is the timezone for the pictures.  If you do what I do and set the time on the camera to local time for your trip you’ll need to adjust the time back to your local time before stamping the pictures (you can do this in Location Stamper by right-clicking a picture or group of pictures and choosing "adjust timestamp").  After you geotag the picture you can set the time back again using the same method. 


Update: WWMX Location Stamper is now downloadable directly from MSR, a lot easier than digging into the source of the WWMX page for the hidden link.

Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:39:45 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 
# Sunday, September 18, 2005

I'm getting close to finishing my hard drive upgrade for my desktop at home (ran out of space for ripping CDs) and the amount of storage I now have made me start thinking back to the computers I've had over my lifetime and how the storage specs have progressed

  • Apple IIe - No hard drive, just a 360 kB floppy drive (...720 kB thanks to a hole punch)
  • Mac LC - 40 MB (I have picture files large than that)
  • Power Mac 8100 - 250 MB (The drive was huge!  For a while, at least)
  • Mac PPC G3 - 4 GB (OS X has a system requirement of 3 GB, I think I can upgrade)
  • Home-built dual Celeron - 40 GB (Now that's huge... right?)
  • Home-built P3 server - 120 GB (That is huge, I'm never going to run out of room now)
  • Home-built MCE - .8 TB (Actually it's 1.6 TB of drives mirrored for data protection)

It's kind of wild, just a couple of years ago that amount of storage seemed obscene... now it's just necessary.

Care to take any bets on how long it takes me to be cramped for space?

Sunday, September 18, 2005 3:45:05 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, May 12, 2005

There's cool, and then there's geeky cool.  I think this is both.

Robots master reproduction
Andreas von Bubnoff
Modular machine assembles copies of itself in minutes.
 
Humans do it, bacteria do it, even viruses do it: they make copies of themselves. Now US researchers have built a flexible robot that can perform the same trick.

Cool, right?  What? I'm a geek?  Here, watch this video then tell me if it's cool.

For the full story, please check out the article at Nature.com.

robot.jpg

"Sarah Connor?"

Thursday, May 12, 2005 4:00:19 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Wednesday, March 23, 2005

I've been jealous of my coworkers in Redmond for a while because the Seattle-area has a very cool system for monitoring traffic status.  It now seems that the bay area may finally be catching up. 

Traffic.com now appears to have real-time traffic reporting for the south bay (read: Silicon Valley).  I honestly don't know when they started reporting in real time as last time I looked for real-time traffic in the south bay was a year or so ago.  Traffic.com offers traffic for a number of metro areas like New York, LA and San Francisco.  If your city is not explicitly listed, don't despair, look for the closest metro area.  For example, San Jose is grouped in with San Francisco. 

traffic.gif

Where's the beef?  Traffic.com gets some of its funding from ads but it is also a marketing tool for Mobility Technologies to help drive adoption of its telematics technologies (you can sign up for news from them on their products when you register for your free access).  Mobility's travel data program gets federal funding (at $2M for specific metro areas) but they do end up sharing their profits with the government.  Mobility focuses on 3 markets: reselling data to broadcasters, selling real-time equipment to large agencies and finally telematics equipment to consumers.

Mobility's Traffic Pulse Networks® are automated systems for radio and tv broadcasters.  The material on their site reads like the brochures you might find on the desk of a tv or radio sales manager.  In short, buy our service and you'll make money hand-over-fist.

The solutions Mobility sells to businesses and government (and potentially consumers with deep pockets) are focused on delivering the same type of information you get from the web page but in a customizable form.  I could see UPS buying into this type of service to get a leg up on FedEx.

The really cool bit for me is Mobility's telematics.  This is where we should have been ages ago, having real time traffic in our cars that link into the GPS navigation to intelligently route us around bad spots.  It's not explicitly stated on their site but the 2005 Acura RL has technology from Mobility which links GPS with XM-transmitted traffic data.  Dare I say it?  That's so boss.  Now, if I could only get the service in something a little more sporty.

Sources: Mobility's web site, Traffic.com and the clever people who keep posting confidential Mobility business presentations in locations where Google can index them.

Wednesday, March 23, 2005 11:25:33 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, March 15, 2005

I know I could be considered a complete MS lackey (something about MS paying me has a bit of an influence in that) but I must confess... I really love my TiVo (both of them).  I purchased the first TiVo on my wife's insistence and never regretted it.  It is simple to use and packed with great features.  I also have a Windows Media Center and love the features of it as well (check out this post by Ed Bott for an superb comparison of the two devices) but was too cheap to buy a new PC and moved it away from the TV (hmm... keep using my 500MHz Celeron or steal the 3.2 GHz MCE form the living room no one is using?).

 

My fondness for the TiVo, I'll admit, is partially an over-inflated wish for fair play.  TiVo was the first break the ground for the DVR/PVR market only to see their share of the market slowly be nibbled away by competition and cable/satellite providers offering cheaper (and arguably poorer) solutions.  When Engadget started their TiVo deathwatch my heart sank.  It's so funny how we love to root for the underdog.

 

Thankfully Comcast and TiVo have worked out a partnership deal which will have TiVo writing the software for Comcast's PVR boxes.  This great news will mean I won't have to worry about replacing my TiVo boxes any time in the immediate future (and the stock market agreed, if only mildly).

 

Long live TiVo (but please go buy a Windows Media Center PC... it helps put food on my table smily face).

TV | Gear | Hardware
Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:46:11 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, February 22, 2005

UPS, FedEX, USPS... take note: if you can do a better job keeping track of packages than DHL I will insist that all shipments to me use your services.

I recently ordered three items from Dell computer... a pair of LCD monitors for me and my wife and a docking station for my wife's laptop.  All three packages were picked up at identical times from Dell by DHL.  Two of the packages are identically-sized, the third very close in size.  All three packages are being shipped to the same location, my home.  Check out the shipping status table below and tell me if you can spot my frustration?

Date Time Activity/comments Location
Monitor 1 - Current status: Delivered
2/21/2005 2:13PM Shipment delivered.   San Jose South, CA
2/21/2005 2:13PM With delivery courier.    
2/21/2005 7:59AM Arrived at DHL facility.   San Jose South, CA
2/18/2005 3:42PM Picked Up by DHL. Shipper's Door
Monitor 2 - Current status: Processed at Sort Facility.
2/20/2005 11:23AM Processed at Sort Facility.   Wilmington, OH
2/18/2005 3:42PM Picked Up by DHL. Shipper's Door
Docking station - Current status: In transit.
2/18/2005 3:42PM Picked Up by DHL. Shipper's Door

Every item was picked up from Dell by DHL at the exact same time on Friday.  Even though the box for the Dock is going to be a similar size to the monitor boxes, the Dock is 5 lbs and the monitors are 26 lbs... let's give DHL the benefit of the doubt and expect the monitors will be traveling together.  No?  They're not?  One arrived yesterday... 3 days ahead of schedule.

Okay, let's give DHL the benefit of the doubt and expect they'll get the same level of tracking detail.  Oops, sorry.  One package was tracked through a sorting facility in Ohio... the other simply showed up in San Jose with no intermediate stops. 

What about the dock?  It’s been “in transit” since the day it was picked up… no other detail is available… naturally.  Tracking number?  What’s that for?

"Hey Reeves, you got a package early, you should be happy."

Well, sure, if I didn't have a job and my wife wasn't in school we could sit at home all week waiting for the packages to trickle in.  Heck, I'd be happy with a semi-accurate tracking of the packages so I could plan to be home to receive them.  Having no idea when the boxes will arrive is disconcerting.  Receiving the 3 orders over a random number of days is frustrating.  Knowing I ordered a stack of expensive computer equipment and the shipper is sloppy in tracking and handling it is annoying.  Calling DHL to suggest they be more consistent and getting the attitude of "hey, you got your package early, you should be happy" is infuriating.  DHL, that's one step away from saying "hey, you got your package, you should be happy."

DHL: From this day forward I'm going to insist all shippers use UPS, FedEX or USPS... and I will pay extra for the privilege of not using your sloppy service.

Life | Tech | Hardware
Tuesday, February 22, 2005 9:33:58 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  | 
# Tuesday, January 11, 2005

No one ever wants to believe their computer will fail them.  You can try to make yourself feel safer... your computer is new, it's under warranty, you take good care of it... but make no mistake, your computer will fail, and probably at a really really bad time.  Here's something that may help you make up your mind: I received a brand-new laptop at work in July of 2002, by September of 2002 the hard drive had failed completely.  Brand new hard can fail and older drives will fail. You must have a back up solution.

I can hear the whining already: Back ups?  Are you sure?  Making backups is such a pain.  It's too hard.  I don't know how!

a) Backing up your data can be easy
b) You aren't safe

People who have tried back up solutions in the past which require swapping floppies in and out or copying data to CDs will no doubt agree, backing up data can be a long tedious process.  Corporate backups used to be made to tape drives, also time consuming and definitely expensive.  There is good news: the plummeting price of hard drives has made back up much simpler and cheaper.  Couple an inexpensive external drive with some inexpensive software and you have yourself a backup solution.

This past winter vacation I set up a very simple backup solution on both my parents computers.  I used an external hard drive connected via USB (yes, simple plug in, just like a digital camera) and some straight forward software from Symantec called Norton Ghost 9.0.  It took a bit of time to format the hard drive (not difficult, just had to wait, it takes time) and no time at all to set up Ghost.  The software will automatically back up a computer on a schedule you specify.  It couldn't be more simple.

The best back up systems will protect you from:
1. Hardware failure (the inevitable drive failure)
2. Theft (it happens)
3. Hardware destruction (house fire or clumsy nephew with a can of Coke)

You love your digital camera, don't you?  You take a whole mess of pictures.  Now... what happens if your hard drive crashes?  The hard drive contains what amounts to negatives for all your digital pictures.  Having your hard drive crash is really like having your digital house burn down.  Eeek!  If your real house burns down you will loose all your pictures and the negatives, but you can easily protect your digital negatives.  Take your external back up hard drive to work with you for added data security.

So, here's the recipe:
1) Determine the size of the hard drive inside your computer
2) Find an external hard drive equal to or larger than your computer's drive (try Price Watch for good prices)
3) Select some backup software (list of options at bottom)
4) Install both and set the software to run automatically

Most computers have hard drives smaller than 80 gigabytes, an 80 gigabyte USB drive found on price watch: less than $70.  Backup software can be had for less than $50.  I'm sure the data on your computer is worth more than $120 and an hour of your time.


Here are some possible back up software solutions:

Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:48:03 PM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  | 
# Thursday, December 02, 2004

Imagine a lens for your camera phone that is very small and has no moving parts yet is still able to focus and zoom like the “huge” lens you already have.  French startup Varioptic has come up with a technology that makes zoom lens elements which have been shrunk down to a couple millimeters in size... but they say they'll go smaller.

The technology is very cool.  They sandwich a couple of liquids of similar density into their element and move the edges of the liquid “bubble” by applying electrostatic pressure.  The surface tension forces the shape to bulge, focusing the element.  Clever.

Now maybe that Dick Tracy watch can really have a video phone!

Get the whole picture on this story at the register.

Thursday, December 02, 2004 10:42:26 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  | 
# Wednesday, June 23, 2004

The nice help desk guy got me up and running once again (and in fairly short order too).  There are a lot of perks to to working at Microsoft, not the least of which is getting questions answered (either from tech support or the people who designed the software in the first place).

The solution to my problem was to use the recovery module on the XP install CD to manually copy a new system file over from the CD's system folder.  There may have been an automated method but it wasn't obvious (not to mention the MCE install CD I had wouldn't do the trick).  There was no way I was going to get it solved on my own except by wiping out Windows and starting fresh.

Now I just need to fix all drivers that managed to break in the repair process... how does replacing that one file cause all the other stuff to break?

Wednesday, June 23, 2004 9:04:41 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 
# Monday, June 21, 2004

I was hoping to keep a record of my vacation (more for my sake than for any interest it might have) but my laptop threw a shoe. 

Windows could not start because the following file is missing or corrupt:
\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\SYSTEM

Kee-rap!  Wouldn't you know it, I have CDs of Windows from 98 to XP home but no XP pro cds to attempt a repair (I have MCE CDs but they seem to lock up when attempting to use them).

Oh Joy.  I get to pull my hard drive.

Monday, June 21, 2004 10:53:48 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Friday, November 22, 2002

Hot laptop burns scientist's penis.

One question: what was he wearing?

Friday, November 22, 2002 10:15:06 AM (Pacific Standard Time, UTC-08:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |